<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Standing With Sarah &#187; Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://standingwithsarah.com/category/featured/economy-featured/energy-featured/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://standingwithsarah.com</link>
	<description>Not Left, Not Right, Just Front and Center!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:14:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fuel America with Terrorist-Tarred Oil Instead of Drilling Our Own, Baby?</title>
		<link>http://standingwithsarah.com/2010/06/fuel-america-with-terrorist-tarred-oil-instead-of-drilling-our-own-baby/</link>
		<comments>http://standingwithsarah.com/2010/06/fuel-america-with-terrorist-tarred-oil-instead-of-drilling-our-own-baby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 02:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Palin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standingwithsarah.com/?p=5982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I the only one who wonders what could possibly be the agenda of any politician who would thwart our drive toward energy independence? Continuing to lock up America’s domestic energy reserves, including the energy-rich Last Frontier of Alaska, only equips dangerous foreign regimes as they fund terrorist organizations to harm us and our allies. I’m going to keep speaking and writing about this in the simplest of terms until someone can provide a simple answer as to why liberal Democrats don’t understand that we have safe, warehoused onshore and shallow water reserves waiting for permission to be extracted. They either choose not to understand the geology, science, and technology behind an “all-of-the-above” approach to energy security, or they understand it, yet for whatever frightening reason choose to be lap dogs to Chavez and Ahmadinejad. Shoot, I must have lived such a doggoned sheltered life as a normal, independent American up there in the Last Frontier, schooled with only public education and a lowly state university degree, because obviously I haven’t learned enough to dismiss common sense (a prerequisite for power in Washington these days). Help me out, friends! Help someone like me – and the majority of Americans – [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://standingwithsarah.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Sarah+Palin+Attends+Campaign+Event+Texas+Governor+2DP1CXctUR9l.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-6004" title="Sarah+Palin+Attends+Campaign+Event+Texas+Governor+2DP1CXctUR9l" src="http://standingwithsarah.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Sarah+Palin+Attends+Campaign+Event+Texas+Governor+2DP1CXctUR9l-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Am I the only one who wonders what could possibly be the agenda of any politician who would thwart our drive toward energy independence? Continuing to lock up America’s domestic energy reserves, including the energy-rich Last Frontier of Alaska, only equips dangerous foreign regimes as they fund terrorist organizations to harm us and our allies. I’m going to keep speaking and writing about this in the simplest of terms until someone can provide a simple answer as to why liberal Democrats don’t understand that we have safe, warehoused onshore and shallow water reserves waiting for permission to be extracted. They either choose not to understand the geology, science, and technology behind an “all-of-the-above” approach to energy security, or they understand it, yet for whatever frightening reason choose to be lap dogs to Chavez and Ahmadinejad.</p>
<p>Shoot, I must have lived such a doggoned sheltered life as a normal, independent American up there in the Last Frontier, schooled with only public education and a lowly state university degree, because obviously I haven’t learned enough to dismiss common sense (a prerequisite for power in Washington these days). Help me out, friends! Help someone like me – and the majority of Americans – understand why we would ever kowtow and bow to foreign regimes that hate us, instead of doing all we can to starve the beast of terrorism in our plight for security, prosperity, and peace.</p>
<p>There’s an obvious common sense answer to our need for security and energy independence, but don’t hold your breath waiting for common sense to surface in Washington – it’s an endangered species there. Obviously we must responsibly develop our God-given domestic oil and gas reserves right here, right now; we must conserve energy; and we must develop renewables that are based on sound science, not snake oil and favors for political pals.</p>
<p>Please read <a title="http://news.newsmax.com/?Z646.WSjaO0L7BJOCpKk6QX1DXbftJU1Z" href="http://www.facebook.com/note_redirect.php?note_id=398548958434&amp;h=a93f8e2923188ec0f980a7ade0e6d4a9&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.newsmax.com%2F%3FZ646.WSjaO0L7BJOCpKk6QX1DXbftJU1Z" target="_blank">the following Newsmax article</a> (posted below) summarizing GOP efforts to push the Obama Administration to produce a plan to potentially wean us off one source of dangerous foreign oil. (Of course, I think the prodding should be even more aggressive to shake up the naïve complacency of anti-development Democrats and some deer-in-the-headlights mainstream reporters who are finally realizing they’d been buffaloed into believing any politician had all the answers.)</p>
<p>We must understand the imperative nature of energy security, along with America’s life and death need to secure our borders. Baby, this is why I won’t sit down and shut up about the need to drill.</p>
<p>- Sarah Palin</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><a title="http://news.newsmax.com/?Z646.WSjaO0L7BJOCpKk6QX1DXbftJU1Z" href="http://www.facebook.com/note_redirect.php?note_id=398548958434&amp;h=a93f8e2923188ec0f980a7ade0e6d4a9&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.newsmax.com%2F%3FZ646.WSjaO0L7BJOCpKk6QX1DXbftJU1Z" target="_blank">Senators Demand Answers on Venezuela’s Links to Terrorism</a></strong></p>
<p><em>A dozen Republican senators have sent a letter challenging the Obama administration to explain what it knows about Venezuela’s support for terrorism and suggesting that the country be declared a “state sponsor of terrorism.”</em></p>
<p><em>“Hugo Chavez’s relationships with Iran and other foreign terrorist organizations continue to grow and pose a serious threat to our hemisphere,” Sen. George LeMieux of Florida, one signer of the letter, said of the Venezuelan president.</em></p>
<p><em>“I encourage the State Department to thoroughly evaluate Venezuela’s actions and determine if the country needs to be added to the official U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism.”</em></p>
<p><em>John Ensign of Nevada, who drafted the letter along with LeMieux, declared: “It’s no secret to the American people that Venezuela wishes harm to the United States. What is secret is how many more ties to terrorist organizations and state sponsors of terrorism does Venezuela need to be declared a state sponsor of terrorism.”</em></p>
<p><em>The letter addressed to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton points to a number of concerns raised by Chavez’s Venezuela:<br />
</em></p>
<ul><em><br />
</em></p>
<li><em>Surface-to-air missiles and other weapons have reportedly been provided by Venezuela to FARC guerrillas in Colombia. An arms cache captured from FARC in 2008 included Swedish-made anti-tank rocket launchers that had been sold to Venezuela.<br />
</em></li>
<li><em>Venezuela provides cross-border sanctuaries for Colombian guerrillas.<br />
</em></li>
<li><em>A United Nations report last year disclosed that nearly one-third of all cocaine produced in the Andean region passes through Venezuela. The senators question how much terrorist groups such as al-Qaida profit from trafficking drugs that originate in or flow through Venezuela.<br />
</em></li>
<li><em>The U.S. has frozen the assets of two Venezuelans, including one working for Chavez, for providing direct support to the terrorist group Hezbollah. The senators ask the State Department for an assessment of the activities of Hezbollah inside Venezuela.<br />
</em></li>
<li><em>Chavez’s “extensive support” of the Castro regime in Cuba is calculated to amount to $1 billion a year, and Cuban advisors are involved in the intelligence and security apparatus of the Venezuelan government.<br />
</em></li>
<li><em>Chavez “has repeatedly expressed support” for Iran’s covert nuclear program and announced a plan for the construction of a “nuclear village” in Venezuela with Iranian assistance. Also, Chavez has pledged to provide Iran with 20,000 barrels of gasoline per day.<br />
</em></li>
<li><em>As for Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, “recent years have witnessed an increased presence in Latin America, particularly Venezuela.”<br />
</em></li>
<li><em>Weekly flights connecting Iran, Syria, and Venezuela raise suspicions of “nefarious purposes” because passengers on these flights have been subject to only “cursory immigration and customs controls.”<br />
</em></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p><em><br />
Newsmax magazine’s May issue disclosed that Iranian security officers seal off the airport in the Venezuelan capital, Caracas, two hours before Iran Air jets arrived. Those officers supervise cargo unloading with no inspection by local officials.</em></p>
<p><em>Iran could easily fly in highly enriched uranium that could then be carried into the U.S. from Mexico, increasing the risk of a terrorist attack with a nuclear weapon.</em></p>
<p><em>If the U.S. did declare Venezuela a state sponsor of terrorism, American arms sales to the country would be prohibited, as would U.S. economic assistance, and severe restrictions would be placed on bilateral trade.</em></p>
<p><em>“The Obama administration’s decision to pull the trigger on Venezuela may hinge on whether the United States can afford to forfeit petroleum exports from that South American country,” Roger F. Noriega, a former assistant secretary of state and a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, observes on the Institute’s journal, The American.</em></p>
<p><em>“Anticipating the argument that Venezuela’s oil supply is too essential to the U.S. economy to risk slapping that country with the terrorist label, the senators ask the administration to explain its ‘contingency plan’ for dealing with a ‘sudden and prolonged unavailability of Venezuelan oil exports to the United States.’”</em></p>
<p><em>In answer to the question, the U.S. would likely find new sources of oil on the international market — but Venezuela’s economy will be crippled by the loss of oil revenue and consumer imports, Noriega notes, adding: “Since the last years of the George W. Bush administration, U.S. diplomats have steered clear of Chavez for fear of ‘provoking’ him. Thanks to congressional oversight, we are about to confront the terrible downside of that naïve, passive policy.”</em></p>
<p><em>Other senators who signed the letter include John McCain of Arizona, Scott Brown of Massachusetts, and Republican Whip Jon Kyl of Arizona.</em></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>as posted by and WRITTEN by SARAH PALIN on her Face Book &#8220;<a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=398548958434" target="_blank">Notes</a>&#8221; page, written by her TOO don&#8217;t forget! &#8212; June 13, 2010</strong></span><em><br />
</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standingwithsarah.com/2010/06/fuel-america-with-terrorist-tarred-oil-instead-of-drilling-our-own-baby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domestic Drilling: Why We Can Still Believe</title>
		<link>http://standingwithsarah.com/2010/05/domestic-drilling-why-we-can-still-believe/</link>
		<comments>http://standingwithsarah.com/2010/05/domestic-drilling-why-we-can-still-believe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 03:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Palin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Petroleum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf of Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore driling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Sector-Public Sector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standingwithsarah.com/?p=5521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’ve all been shocked and saddened by the tragic events in the Gulf of Mexico. My heart breaks for coastal residents who are facing fears of the unknown impacts of the oil spill. As an Alaskan, I can speak from the heart about the tragedy of an oil spill. For as long as I live, I will never forget the day the Exxon-Valdez ran aground on Bligh Reef and millions of gallons of North Slope crude poured into the waters of our beautiful Prince William Sound. The spill was devastating to so many Alaskans who, like my own family, make their living on the water from our commercial fishing industry. “Heartbreaking” was the word my husband Todd, an Alaska Native and trained oil spill responder, used to describe the scene as we watched it unfold on land and water that we feel is sacred. Alaskans understand the tragedy of an oil spill, and we’ve taken steps to do all we can to prevent another Exxon tragedy, but we are still pro-development. We still believe in responsible development, which includes drilling to extract energy sources, because we know that there is an inherent link between energy and security, energy and prosperity, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://standingwithsarah.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/715Gulf_Oil_Spill_sff_slideshow_main_prod_affiliate_80.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-5535" title="715Gulf_Oil_Spill_sff_slideshow_main_prod_affiliate_80" src="http://standingwithsarah.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/715Gulf_Oil_Spill_sff_slideshow_main_prod_affiliate_80-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a></p>
<p>We’ve all been shocked and saddened by the tragic events in the Gulf of Mexico. My heart breaks for coastal residents who are facing fears of the unknown impacts of the oil spill.</p>
<p>As an Alaskan, I can speak from the heart about the tragedy of an oil spill. For as long as I live, I will never forget the day the <em>Exxon-Valdez</em> ran aground on Bligh Reef and millions of gallons of North Slope crude poured into the waters of our beautiful Prince William Sound. The spill was devastating to so many Alaskans who, like my own family, make their living on the water from our commercial fishing industry. “Heartbreaking” was the word my husband Todd, an Alaska Native and trained oil spill responder, used to describe the scene as we watched it unfold on land and water that we feel is sacred.</p>
<p>Alaskans understand the tragedy of an oil spill, and we’ve taken steps to do all we can to prevent another Exxon tragedy, but we are <em>still</em> pro-development. We still believe in responsible development, which includes drilling to extract energy sources, because we know that there is an inherent link between energy and security, energy and prosperity, and energy and freedom. Production of our own resources means security for America and opportunities for American workers. We need oil, and if we don’t drill for it here, we have to purchase it from countries that not only do not like America and can use energy purchases as a weapon against us, but also do not have the oversight that America has.</p>
<p>In the coming days, there will be hearings to discover the cause of the explosion and the subsequent leak. Actions will be taken to increase oversight to prevent future accidents. Government can and must play an appropriate role here. If a company was lax in its prevention practices, it must be held accountable. It is inexcusable for any oil company to not invest in preventative measures. They <em>must</em> be held accountable or the public will forever distrust the industry.</p>
<p>This was the position I took as an oil and gas regulator and as Governor of Alaska when my administration ramped up oversight of the oil industry and created a petroleum-systems-integrity office to monitor our oil and gas infrastructure for potential environmental risks. I took a lot of heat for the stand I took “against the oil industry” (which is how political adversaries labeled my actions). But we took tough action because there was proof of some improper maintenance of oil infrastructure which I believed was unacceptable. We instituted new oversight and held British Petroleum (BP) financially accountable for poor maintenance practices. We also filed a Friend-of-the-Court brief against Exxon’s interests for its decades-old responsibility to compensate Alaskans affected by the Valdez spill, and I took other actions “against” the industry which ultimately helped hold it accountable.</p>
<p>All responsible energy development must be accompanied by strict oversight, but even with the strictest oversight in the world, accidents still happen. No human endeavor is ever without risk – whether it’s sending a man to the moon or extracting the necessary resources to fuel our civilization. I repeat the slogan “drill here, drill now” not out of naiveté or disregard for the tragic consequences of oil spills – my family and my state and I know firsthand those consequences. How could I still believe in drilling America’s domestic supply of energy after having seen the devastation of the <em>Exxon-Valdez</em> spill? I continue to believe in it because increased domestic oil production will make us a more secure, prosperous, and peaceful nation.</p>
<p>Our hearts go out to all Americans along the coast affected by this recent tragedy, especially those who lost family members in the rig explosion, and our prayers go up for a successful recovery. May spill responders be safe.  &#8211; Sarah Palin</p>
<div>as posted by Sarah Palin on her Face Book &#8220;<a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=384560338434" target="_blank">Notes</a>&#8221; page, April 30,2010</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standingwithsarah.com/2010/05/domestic-drilling-why-we-can-still-believe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.597 seconds -->
